Energy Transition Planning in Achieving the
2060 Net-Zero Emissions Target in the Electricity Sector of North Sumatra
Province
Muhamad Iqbal Sutikno1,
Suhanan2, Ahmad Agus Setiawan3
Gadjah Mada University,
Indonesia
E-mail: [email protected]
�
Corresponding Author: Muhamad Iqbal Sutikno
Abstract |
|
Energy Transition; Net Zero Emissions; North Sumatra; LEAP; Climate change; |
Accessibility, adequacy,
and environmental sustainability principles in providing a national
electricity supply will become key demands in the coming years. The energy
transition from fossil fuel sources to renewable energy is necessary to
mitigate the impact of climate change, with projections towards the Net-Zero
Emissions target by 2060 in Indonesia. The study aims to model energy
transition scenarios, evaluate the optimal renewable energy mix, and
determine emission reduction strategies in the electricity sector using
LEAP-NEMO software. This study uses a forecasting-based simulation modeling
method with a mathematical approach through LEAP software and NEMO
optimization framework. Three scenarios were analyzed, namely Business As Usual (BAU), Net Zero Emissions Carbon Capture Storage
(NZE CCS), and Net Zero Emissions Full Renewable Energy (NZE FRE). The study results show
that by 2060, the NZE FRE scenario can achieve a 100% renewable energy mix,
compared to the BAU scenario (42.1%) and the NZE CCS scenario (70.8%). Solar,
biomass, hydro, and geothermal energy are projected to be the main sources of
electricity generation in the NZE FRE scenario, with solar energy as the
largest contributor. The NZE FRE scenario is also proven to be the most
effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions by up to 265.9 million tons of
CO₂, or 70.5% of avoidable greenhouse gas emissions, compared to the
BAU scenario. Although the cost of the NZE FRE scenario is higher, it can
provide lower external impacts and long-term benefits in environmental
sustainability. � 2024 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access
publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). |
1�� Introduction
The generation of electricity
using fossil fuels has a serious impact on the sustainability of non-renewable
resources as well as increasing greenhouse gas emissions which have a
significant impact on global temperature rise. Based on the Ember Climate
report, global emissions produced by power plants increased to 12,431 million
tons of CO₂ (mt CO₂) in 2022 with Indonesia ranking ninth among the
world�s largest CO₂ emitters, recording 192.7 mt CO₂ in greenhouse
gas emissions. It is projected that this emission value will continue to rise
until 2030 (Ember Climate, 2024). In an effort to limit the rate of global
temperature rise and reduce the adverse effects of climate change, in 2015 the Paris Agreement was agreed which requires countries to
contribute and strive to reduce emissions to the maximum. The agreement was
supported by 195 countries present at the time, including Indonesia, which had
also ratified the Paris Agreement in 2016.
North Sumatra Province with a
population of 15.47 million people or 5.51% of the total national population (Dukcapil Kemendagri, 2022) occupies the fourth position in the
largest population in Indonesia. In 2023, the province recorded economic growth
of 5.01% (BPS, 2024), ranking among the highest middle levels in Indonesia.
North Sumatra is also the sixth province with the largest distribution of
electricity, reaching 12,059 GWh in 2022 (MEMR, 2023). Based on the IEA report,
greenhouse gas emissions in Indonesia are influenced by variables of population
growth, energy consumption, and economic rate (IEA, 2022). Some of these
variables make North Sumatra one of the provinces that plays a key role in
decarbonization efforts towards the net-zero emissions target by 2060 in
Indonesia.
The energy transition towards a
greener electricity system has been a global concern, with a focus on shifting
from a centralized model to a decentralized model that utilizes renewable
energy sources. According to research by Christophe Defeuilley
(2019), public policy and institutional change have an important role in
shaping the future of the electricity sector. These factors are recognized as
the main drivers of electricity system change, along with increasing public
support, decreasing technology costs, and innovations in energy storage (Defeuilley, 2019).
Many studies have simulated
energy transition planning in the electricity sector from fossil fuel sources
to clean and renewable energy, such as a study conducted by Handayani
et al. (2023) in Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar which shows the potential for the
application of renewable energy supported by energy storage technology to
achieve net zero emissions target. The study uses the Low Emissions Analysis
Platform (LEAP) as software to simulate a 100% renewable energy integration
scenario in the electricity sectors of the three countries, which has proven
feasible and sustainable despite requiring a large cost investment (Handayani, K. et al., 2023). Meanwhile, on a regional scale
in the province of North Sumatra, the research from Sri Ulina et al. (2022)
shows significant potential utilization in hydro, wind, and biomass energy,
which is expected to make an important contribution to the decarbonization of
the electricity system at the regional level until 2028 (Ulina, S. et al.,
2022).
Another study conducted by V.
Wambui et al. (2022) in Kenya highlighted the benefits of renewable energy
development accompanied by the internalization factor of environmental
externalities. The results of this study show that the development of renewable
energy sources with energy storage can reduce CO₂ emissions, improve the
reliability of the electric power system and provide great benefits in terms of
cost-effectiveness, especially when environmental externalities are taken into
account in the form of emission taxes (Wambui, V. et al. 2022). On the other
hand, research by Zhongrui Ren et al. (2024) in China
uses LEAP software combined with NEMO (Next Energy Modelling System for
Optimization) to simulate a scenario of high renewable energy penetration and
gradually increasing carbon prices, as well as a subsidy scenario for the renewable
energy sector. The results show that the combination of carbon pricing and
subsidy policies in the renewable energy sector plays an important role in
achieving net zero emissions by 2050 (Ren, Z. et al., 2024).
Another study by Ahmed Hassan et
al. (2023) explored the scenario of the renewable energy mix in Egypt in the
2020-2050 range and concluded that optimizing the increase in the portion of
renewable energy in the national energy mix can significantly reduce greenhouse
gas emissions and reduce energy production costs in the long term (Sayed, A. et
al., 2023). Handayani, Filatova, et al. (2020)
conducted a study using LEAP software combined with WEAP to simulate climate
change mitigation efforts and long-term electricity system planning in the
Java-Bali system by considering the impact of climate change on the demand and
supply of electricity (Handayani, K. et al., 2020).
Research on the energy transition
at another regional level, namely on the Sumatra electricity system by Abeth Novria Sonjaya et al. (2023)
which mapped and harnessed the renewable energy potential in Sumatra Island for
2020-2050 using LEAP software highlighted that without significant
intervention, CO₂ emissions in the region could almost double by 2028 (Sonjaya, A. et al., 2023). Meanwhile, another research
study by Handayani, Anugrah, et al. (2022) on the
ASEAN electricity system stated that the net-zero emission target can be
achieved with the optimal use of renewable energy, especially PV technology
which will contribute 61% to the energy capacity mix by 2050, although this
scenario requires greater costs than other scenarios (Handayani,
K. et al., 2022).
Based on the background of the
problems raised and several previous research studies, North Sumatra Province
with a projection of electricity consumption that will continue to increase in
the future and has great potential in the development of renewable energy
sources, has a strategic role in the clean energy transition efforts to achieve
net zero emissions targeting Indonesia by 2060. This study aims to plan and
analyze the energy transition in the electricity sector of North Sumatra
province, identify renewable energy mixes that can meet electricity needs, and
determine the best emission reduction scenario to achieve the net-zero emissions
target by 2060.
2 Materials and Methods
�This study uses an energy modeling method with
forecasting-based simulation calculations with a mathematical approach using
analytical programming (LEAP-NEMO model framework). LEAP software with the NEMO
optimization framework is used as a modeling tool to estimate and evaluate
energy transition scenarios in the electricity sector of North Sumatra
Province. Below are some sub-discussions about the research methods conducted
in this study.
A.
Electricity System
Modeling Design Method
The modeling uses the LEAP-NEMO
framework which is designed by having several modules for the simulation
process. The modules used include: an electricity demand projection module that
aims to model how energy needs will evolve in the future, an electricity supply
projection module that aims to model the electricity supply to meet a given
demand, a cost module, and an emissions projection module that is used to
calculate and compare GHG emissions generated from the electricity system in
various scenarios.
The next process in designing electricity
system modeling is to compile three scenarios used in the modeling simulation
process. These three scenarios are designed based on reference to regulations,
policies and recommendations related to the energy transition in the
electricity sector to achieve NZE 2060 in Indonesia. The first scenario is the
Business as Usual (BAU) scenario which assumes the continuation of portfolio
flows based on the Electricity Supply Business Plan 2021-2030 (RUPTL) and the
Regional Energy General Plan (RUED) in the current electricity sector without
significant intervention with a target of implementing renewable energy of 23%
by 2025 and at least 31% by 2050 (National Energy Policy, 2014). In the BAU
scenario, the addition of coal-fired power plants and natural gas coal-fired
power plants is unlimited and competes with all available generation
technologies. In addition, the BAU scenario also serves as a comparative
reference when assessing the implications of the other two scenarios.
The second scenario is the Net
Zero Emissions Carbon Capture Storage (NZE CCS) scenario based on a progressive
renewable energy utilization policy of at least 70% by 2060 (MEMR, 2024), whose
implementation is limited by the potential resources available & technical
potential. The NZE CCS scenario also applies carbon capture technology to coal,
natural gas, and biomass power plants starting in 2035 which is also supported
by the application of biomass cofiring starting in 2025 in coal-fired power
plants to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. To optimize the results of electricity
generation from renewable energy, this scenario also utilizes energy storage
technologies, including hydro pump storage (HPS) and battery energy storage
system (BESS).
Meanwhile, in the last scenario,
namely the Net Zero Emission Full Renewable Energy (NZE FRE) scenario which
simulates the integration of 100% of existing renewable energy potential into
the electricity system of North Sumatra province.� This scenario does not use carbon capture
technology in the simulation process, the application of renewable energy is
limited by the potential of available resources and their technical potential
as well as the development of the utilization of energy storage technology which
includes hydro pump storage (HPS) and battery energy storage system (BESS).
B.
Simulation
Modeling Method with LEAP-NEMO
This research uses LEAP software
or stands for Low Emissions Analysis Platform. LEAP is a software developed by
the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) that is widely used for energy policy
analysis and climate change mitigation evaluation (Heaps, 2022). The modeling
simulation with the hybrid model paradigm in this study combines top-down and
bottom-up approaches in the process of analysis and forecasting of electricity
system development. In the early stages, macroeconomic data, electricity sales
activity, and load curves are used to estimate the final demand for electrical
energy through a top-down approach, which can provide a big picture of energy
demand based on macroeconomic indicators and historical data on electricity
consumption. Figure 1 below shows the simulation framework of the LEAP-NEMO
modeling for this research.
Figure 1.
LEAP-NEMO Modeling Simulation Framework
This simulation framework
includes policy and regulatory inputs in each modeling scenario. Parameters
such as the technical specifications of the power plant, reserve margins,
transmission and distribution losses, renewable energy potential, and others
are used as databases for the simulation of the final electricity supply. A
bottom-up approach is applied to simulate specific policies and technologies in
the provisioning module towards basic energy consumption.
The process of providing electricity
in each scenario must meet several limitations. The simulation was carried out
under two conditions: without NEMO optimization for the BAU scenario and with
NEMO optimization for the NZE CCS and NZE FRE scenarios. In a scenario without
optimization, LEAP adds new power plants capacity to meet annual needs and
regulates electricity distribution based on priority in accordance with
policies and regulations. Meanwhile, in a scenario with NEMO optimization, LEAP
manages the expansion of generation technology capacity, capacity addition
time, and electricity distribution to achieve the lowest cost of electricity
system expansion. The simulation results show electricity generation, energy
mix per scenario, and expansion of plant technology capacity from 2023 to 2060.
The final stage of this hybrid model provides an output in the form of total
system cost, external cost of GHG emissions, and total GHG emissions for each
scenario.
C.
Simulation Data
The electricity demand modeling
conducted in the LEAP software estimates electricity demand based on the
multiplication of electricity intensity values and total electricity
consumption activities. The total electricity consumption activity can be
reflected by the accumulation of the number of electricity customers or the
accumulation of economic activity levels (GRDP). Meanwhile, energy intensity is
the ratio of energy consumption value per electricity customer or per value of
economic activity (GRDP). In this study, the ratio of growth in the number of
customers, economic growth, growth in electricity consumption, and energy
intensity growth value were used to simulate forecasting in the modeling year
period (2023 � 2060) using growth trends based on historical data over the last
10 years (2013 � 2022), in this case this study follows the same projected
growth of electricity demand as in the RUPTL 2021-2030. Table 1 below is a
tabulation of the simulated data of electricity demand used in this study.
Table 1.�
Tabulation of Electricity Demand Simulation Data
Data Caption |
Data Value |
Customer Growth Projection |
4.00 % |
Business as Usual Growth Rate Projection |
4.72 % |
Energy Intensity (Base Year) |
0.00298 GWh/ Customer |
Energy Intensity Growth Projection |
0.70 % |
Energy Elasticity |
1.00 % |
Electrification Ratio Projection
(2023-2060) |
100 % |
Furthermore, Table 2 below is
data on the potential of renewable energy sources in North Sumatra Province (Draft
National Electricity General Plan 2023-2060, 2023)(North Sumatra Provincial
Regional Energy General Plan for 2022-2050, 2022). The potential of this renewable energy will
be one of the limitations used in the transformation process of electricity
generation.
Table 2. Renewable Energy Potential Resources
Energy Source |
Potential (MW) |
Biomass |
3,939 |
Biogas |
116 |
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) |
31 |
Hydro |
5,012 |
Solar |
11,852 |
Wind |
356 |
Geothermal |
2,026 |
Total Potential Resource |
23,332 |
Table 3 below is data on the
existing power generation capacity that has been operating in the province of
North Sumatra in 2022 (Electricity Statistics in 2022, 2023). This data is the
input value in the capacity of 2022 or the base year of the LEAP software.
Table 3.
Existing Power Plants Capacity 2022
Types of Power
Plant |
Capacity
(MW) |
Coal |
1,350 |
Natural
Gas |
1,057.96 |
Diesel |
135.96 |
Hydro |
1,002.45 |
Mini Hydro |
154.53 |
Geothermal |
504.15 |
Wind |
0 |
Solar PV |
0.45 |
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) |
0 |
Biomass |
145.57 |
Biogas |
21.51 |
Total
Capacity |
4,372.58 |
Some technical parameter data is
required as input data in the LEAP software. There are 16 types of technologies
used in this study, but the use and utilization of these types of technologies
will differ according to the characteristics of each scenario, such as the
absence of Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) technology in the Business As Usual scenario because the scenario is a simulation and
not an optimization scenario in the LEAP software. Table 4 below shows the data
on the technical parameters of the power plant technology used in this study
(MEMR, 2024) (IESR, 2023) (Handayani and Anugrah, 2021).
Table 4. Technical Parameter Data of Power
Plant Technology
Types of Technology |
Lifetime (Years) |
Process Efficiency (%) |
Maximum Availability (%) |
Capacity Credit (%) |
Coal |
30 |
42 |
73 |
100 |
Natural gas |
25 |
56 |
85 |
100 |
Diesel |
25 |
45 |
95 |
100 |
Biomass |
25 |
31 |
81 |
100 |
Biogas |
25 |
32 |
85 |
100 |
MSW |
25 |
28 |
90 |
100 |
Hydro |
50 |
100 |
41 |
52 |
Mini Hydro |
50 |
100 |
76 |
58 |
HPS |
60 |
80 |
80 |
25 |
Solar PV |
30 |
100 |
22 |
22 |
Wind |
30 |
100 |
35 |
35 |
Geothermal |
30 |
15 |
80 |
100 |
BESS |
25 |
30 |
17 |
22 |
CCS Coal |
30 |
34 |
80 |
100 |
NG CCS |
25 |
48 |
80 |
100 |
BECCS |
25 |
30 |
90 |
100 |
The projected cost of expanding
the electricity system in this study has several cost variables that play a
role in influencing power generation technology until 2050. Costs considered
include capital cost, fixed o&m cost, variable o&m cost, and fuel cost. Table 5 below is the cost
parameters of each power generation technology (MEMR, 2024) (IESR, 2023) (Handayani and Anugrah, 2021).
Table 5. Power Plants Technology Cost
Parameter
Types of Technology |
Capital Cost (Million USD/MW) |
Fixed O&M Cost (USD/MW) |
Variable O&M Cost (USD/MWh) |
Fuel Cost (USD/MWh) |
|
2023 |
2050 |
||||
Coal |
1.73 |
1.63 |
56.6 |
1.25 |
9.53 |
Natural gas |
1.08 |
0.95 |
23.5 |
2.6 |
23.90 |
Diesel |
0.91 |
0.89 |
8 |
7.3 |
41.50 |
Biomass |
2.28 |
1.82 |
47.6 |
3.4 |
8.34 |
Biogas |
2.45 |
1.84 |
14.85 |
0.13 |
30.71 |
MSW |
5.97 |
4.94 |
243.7 |
27.5 |
5.88 |
Hydro |
2.2 |
1.96 |
37.7 |
0.74 |
0 |
Mini Hydro |
2.5 |
2.23 |
53 |
0.57 |
0 |
HPS |
1.2 |
1.2 |
8 |
0.94 |
0 |
Solar PV |
1.2 |
0.6 |
14.4 |
0 |
0 |
Wind |
1.65 |
0.95 |
60 |
0 |
0 |
Geothermal |
4.4 |
3.96 |
50 |
0.27 |
0 |
BESS |
1.33 |
0.64 |
7.6 |
2.3 |
0 |
CCS Coal |
3.46 |
2.77 |
98.4 |
4.2 |
9.53 |
NG CCS |
1.84 |
1.72 |
32.5 |
4.36 |
23.90 |
BECCS |
5.45 |
5.09 |
64 |
8 |
8.34 |
As shown in the table, capital
costs are projected to decrease by 2050. This is influenced by each
technology's learning rate, where the more research and development are
achieved in energy technologies, the lower the investment costs will be (MEMR,
2024).
This study also considers other
variables in projecting the electricity supply system modules, such as planning
reserve margin data and the projected electricity losses in the transmission
and distribution system in North Sumatra Province. Table 6 below presents the
tabulation of these data requirements. (MEMR, 2023) (PLN, 2021) (MEMR, 2019).
Table 6. Planning Reserve Margin and
Transmission � Distribution Losses
Input Parameters |
Data |
Planning Reserve Margin |
35 % |
Transmission-Distribution Losses Projection
|
8.3 � 6.1 % |
The Planning Reserve Margin in
the LEAP software is used to determine how much additional capacity (as a
percentage) is required above the peak load to maintain system security.
Meanwhile, in the transmission and distribution losses data, the value will
decrease until 2038 with a percentage value of 6.1%.
3 Results and Discussion
A.
Results of the
Electricity Demand Projection
Based on the input process of
several simulation data in the LEAP software, the results of the projection of
electricity demand in North Sumatra province are obtained as shown in Figure 2
below.
Figure 2. Projected Total Electricity Demand in North Sumatra Province
�In 2023, electricity demand is projected to reach 13.0 TWh. This
electricity demand is expected to continue increasing, reaching 18.0 TWh by
2030, with the growth trend continuing over the next 10 years. By 2040, the
demand is projected to reach 28.8 TWh, an increase of 10.8 TWh over the next 10
years. Then, by mid-century 2050, electricity demand is expected to surge to
46.2 TWh. In the final period of the study, by 2060, electricity demand in
North Sumatra Province will reach 74.4 TWh, more than five times higher
compared to the starting year of the study period. Therefore, the total
cumulative electricity demand for North Sumatra Province during the energy
transition planning projection period (2023-2060) will be 1,341.2 TWh.
B.
Results of the
Electricity Supply Projection
1)
BAU Scenario Projection
Based on the simulation results,
electricity production in North Sumatra province until 2060 will still be
dominated by the energy mix produced from fossil fuels, namely coal and natural
gas. It is recorded that in 2025 energy production from coal-fired power plants
will reach 4.5 TWh, and will increase to 4.6 TWh in 2030, 6.8 TWh in 2040, then
this energy production is projected to continue to increase consistently until
it reaches 23.3 TWh in 2060.
Energy produced by natural gas
power plants also recorded a consistent increase. In 2025 the energy produced
is expected to reach 3.3 TWh, and in 2040 it is projected to reach 5.1 TWh
which will also continue to increase to 22.0 TWh by 2060. Furthermore, the
energy generated in other fossil fuel power plants, namely diesel power plant,
will reach 0.4 TWh in 2025 which is projected to continue to decline until it
reaches 0 TWh in 2050. This diesel power plant is widely used in isolated
electricity system on the island of Nias.
In addition to the energy
produced from fossil fuel power plants, renewable energy power plants will also
be one of the resources that will be utilized. In this scenario, the energy
from renewable energy power plants will be dominated by hydro, geothermal and
biomass power plants. In 2060 hydropower plants are projected to generate 12.4
TWh of electricity, while geothermal power plants are 7.8 TWh and biomass power
plants are projected to contribute 5.5 TWh by 2060. Figure 3 below shows the
projected results of electricity generation in the BAU scenario until 2060.
Figure 3. Electricity Generation in the BAU Scenario
2)
NZE CCS Scenario Projection
Based on the International Energy
Agency (IEA) report, as an effort towards a clean energy transition in
Indonesia, carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology can be one way to reduce
the impact of emissions produced on the power generation sector (IEA, 2022).
Figure 4 below shows the projected results of an electricity generation in this
scenario.
Figure 4. Electricity Generation in the NZE CCS Scenario
In the electricity
generation projection, coal and natural gas power plants will continue to be
utilized until 2060, with the integration of CCS technology. In 2025,
electricity production from coal power plants is expected to reach 4.5 TWh,
increasing to 4.8 TWh by 2030, then decreasing to 4.0 TWh by 2035 due to the
high cost of CCS integration and to provide space for the growth of renewable energy power plants. By 2060,
electricity production from coal power plants is projected to reach 10.0 TWh,
lower than in the BAU scenario. Natural gas power plants will generate 3.3 TWh
in 2025, declining by 2035 for reasons similar to coal. However, after 2035,
natural gas production will rise and surpass coal due to lower total costs.
Electricity generation from natural gas will reach 13.7 TWh by 2060, also lower
than in the BAU scenario.
For renewable energy power
plants, electricity production will be dominated by hydropower, geothermal, and
solar power. Hydropower generation will continue to increase, reaching 18.5 TWh
by 2060. Geothermal power generation will also increase to 13.3 TWh, followed
by solar power, which will reach 12.9 TWh. This scenario successfully simulates
a renewable energy mix target of 70.8% by the end of the study period. The NZE
CCS scenario integrates 4.8 GW of Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) by 2060.
3)
NZE FRE Scenario Projection
The NZE FRE scenario projects
that the renewable energy mix in the electricity system of North Sumatra
province will be 100% by 2060 by utilizing all the potential renewable energy
resources available. Figure 5 below is a projection of the electricity
generation in the NZE FRE scenario.
Figure 5. Electricity
Generation in the NZE FRE Scenario
Coal-fired power plants are
projected to generate 4.5 TWh of energy in 2025. However, their production will
gradually decrease to 0 TWh by 2060 as part of the phase-out process and
replacement with renewable energy capacity. A similar decline is expected for
natural gas power plants, which are projected to produce 3.3 TWh in 2025 and
will decline to 2.1 TWh by 2040, eventually reaching 0 TWh by 2060. Meanwhile,
diesel power plants will phase out earlier, in 2050, resulting in a reduction
to 0 TWh by that year. In this NZE FRE scenario, battery energy storage system
(BESS) technology is integrated, just as in the NZE CCS scenario, to support
stability, reliability, and balance in the supply and demand of fluctuating
renewable energy (ASEAN Centre for Energy, 2024). The NZE FRE scenario requires
a battery storage capacity (BESS) of 5.1 GW by 2060.
Hydropower is projected to
generate 4.4 TWh in 2025 and continue increasing to 19.2 TWh by 2060. Energy
from solar power will start at 0.1 TWh in 2025 and grow significantly to reach
22.2 TWh by 2060. Biomass generation is expected to contribute 0.5 TWh in 2025,
gradually increasing to 21.2 TWh by 2060, while geothermal energy will also
make a significant contribution, with projections reaching 14.2 TWh by 2060. In
addition to hydropower, solar, biomass, and geothermal energy, other energy
sources will also play a role in the energy transition, including wind, biogas,
hydro pump storage (HPS), and municipal solid waste (MSW). By 2060, wind energy
generation is expected to reach 1.1 TWh, with biogas energy projected to reach
0.9 TWh, a modest amount due to the limited biogas potential in North Sumatra
Province. HPS technology will be integrated with hydropower, adding 3.5 TWh by
2060, and MSW will contribute 0.1 TWh by 2060.
C.
Projected CO₂ Emissions of Electricity System
Projected power system emissions
are needed as an indicator to measure the impact of greenhouse gas emissions
from several scenarios in this study because of the influence of the expansion
of the electricity system to meet the needs of electricity, as well as the
extent to which the implications will have an impact on the environment in the
next few years. Figure 6 below is the result of the projected greenhouse gas
emissions from the three scenarios.
Figure 6. Projection of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions for the Three Scenarios
The BAU scenario will be the
scenario with the highest carbon emission levels during the study period. The
projected CO₂ emissions in absolute terms for this scenario will continue
to grow from 4.9 Million tons CO₂ in 2030,
reaching an increase to 25.4 Million tons CO₂ by 2060. In the NZE CCS
scenario, the projected CO₂ emissions in absolute value are 4.9 Million tons CO₂ in 2030 and are expected to decrease
to 3.5 Million tons CO₂ by 2060. Furthermore, in the NZE CCS scenario,
the implementation of carbon capture technology is projected to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel-based power plants by 40% starting in
2036. This reduction projection is based on several real-world projects already
implemented in various countries (Schlissel et al., 2021). By 2050, assuming an increase
in the learning rate for carbon capture technology, the carbon capture rate is
expected to reach 80%, which is in line with the ideal conditions studied by
the IPCC (IPCC, 2018).
Meanwhile, in the NZE FRE
scenario, the projected reduction in GHG emissions shows a very significant
decrease compared to the other two scenarios. In this scenario, the projected
GHG emissions in absolute terms will decrease from 4.7 Million
tons CO₂ in 2030 to 0.3 Million tons CO₂ by 2060, driven by
aggressive renewable energy penetration and accompanied by a reduction in the
capacity of fossil fuel-based power plants that will phase out by 2060. Table 7
below shows the cumulative total greenhouse gas emissions for the three
scenarios.
Table 7.�
Projections of Total Emissions from Three Scenarios in Cumulative Value
Scenario Type |
Total Emissions (Million tons CO₂) |
Emission Reduction Compared to BAU |
|
Million tons CO₂ |
Percentage Reduction (%) |
||
BAU |
377,4 |
- |
- |
NZE CCS |
146,1 |
231,3 |
61 % |
NZE FRE |
111,5 |
265,9 |
70,5 % |
D.
Projected Results of Electricity System Costs
Figure 7 below is the result of
the projected total cost of expanding the construction of the North Sumatra
province electricity system in cumulative values with a discount rate of 12%
during the research period (IESR, 2023) (Handayani
and Anugrah, 2021).
Figure 7. Projection of Total Electricity
System Costs
The BAU scenario will be the
scenario with the lowest total projected costs compared to the other two
scenarios. The BAU scenario will require a total cumulative cost of 6.7 billion
USD for the expansion of the electricity system during the period from 2023 to
2060. The NZE CCS scenario becomes the second-highest cost scenario due to the
non-competitiveness of the carbon capture technology integrated into fossil
fuel-based power plants. The NZE CCS scenario is projected to require a total
cumulative cost of 7.8 billion USD over the 2023-2060 period. Meanwhile, the
NZE FRE scenario becomes the scenario with the highest projected costs, with a
total cost of 8.5 billion USD required during the 2023-2060 period.
Furthermore, in the context of
energy transition planning, efforts are also needed to identify external costs
generated by the use of fossil energy, such as health impacts due to air
pollution and environmental damage. These external costs are often not reflected
in the projected total costs of energy transition planning (Wambui, V. et al.,
2022). Figure 8 below is the projected external costs generated in the three
scenarios.
Figure 8. External Cost Projections on the
Electricity System
This study uses a carbon tax rate
of Rp 30,000 per ton of CO₂ equivalent based on reference to Government
Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia number 7 of 2021 on the harmonization
of tax regulations and the Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia
number 98 of 2021 on the implementation of carbon economic value. Based on the
results of projections, the BAU scenario is projected to have a total cumulative external costs of 83.5 million USD during
the 2023-2060 period. In the NZE CCS scenario, the total cumulative external
costs would be lower, at 67.6 million USD. Meanwhile, in the NZE FRE scenario,
the cumulative total external cost over the 2023-2060 period is 61.4 million
USD and will be the scenario with the lowest total external cost when compared
to the other two scenarios.
4 Conclusion
�This study provides recommendations for the
NZE FRE scenario as the best scenario for energy transition planning as a
climate change mitigation effort to achieve the NZE 2060 target. This scenario
has been shown to reduce GHG emissions by 70.5% over the study period when
compared to the projected GHG emissions of the BAU scenario, as well as the
projected GHG emissions of almost zero by 2060. Although the total cumulative
cost of developing an electricity system in the NZE FRE scenario is the largest
among the other two scenarios, the projected external costs of this scenario
are the lowest. In addition, environmental sustainability and climate change
aspects due to GHG emissions that will be borne in the future are one of the
biggest reasons for choosing the NZE FRE scenario to be the best. Further
research could include the influence of future climate change variables that
could affect all components of the electricity system, such as how rising
temperatures and weather may affect electricity demand and the efficiency of
power generation technology.
ASEAN Centre for Energy, "8th ASEAN Energy
Outlook," ASEAN Centre for Energy (ACE), September 2024. Available: https://aseanenergy.org/publications/the-8th-asean-energy-outlook/
C. Defeuilley, "Energy transition and the future of the
electricity sector," Utilities Policy, vol. 57, pp. 97�105, April 2019,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2019.03.002.
C.G. Heaps, "LEAP: A Low Emission Analysis
Platform," [Software version: 2020.1.112], Stockholm Environmental
Institute, Somerville, MA, USA, 2022.
BPS North Sumatra Province, "North Sumatra Economic
Growth Quarter IV-2023," February 2024. Available: https://sumut.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2024/02/05/1212/ekonomi-sumatera-utara-tahun-2023-tumbuh-sebesar-5-01-persen--c-to-c-.html
D. Schlissel, "Boundary Dam 3 Coal Plant Achieves Goal
of Capturing 4 Million Metric Tons of CO₂ �but Achieves Goal Two Years Late,"
Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), April 2021.
Dukcapil.Kemendagri.Go.Id. "Directorate General of Civil
Registration of the Ministry of Home Affairs," https://dukcapil.kemendagri.go.id/page/read/data-kependudukan
Ember Climate, "Global Electricity Outlook 2023,"
April 2023. Available: https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/global-electricity-review-2023/#supporting-material
MEMR, "National Energy Policy RPP Targeted to be
Completed in June 2024,"January 19, 2024. https://www.esdm.go.id/id/media-center/arsip-berita/rpp-kebijakan-energi-nasional-ditargetkan-selesai-juni-2024
Government of the Republic of Indonesia, Government
Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2021 concerning
Harmonization of Tax Regulations, 2021.
IESR, "A 2023's Update on The Levelized Cost of
Electricity and Levelized Cost of Storage in Indonesia," Mar. 2023.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),
"Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage," 2018.
International Energy Agency (IEA), "An Energy Sector Roadmap to Net Zero Emissions in Indonesia ",� September 2022.
Handayani K and P. Anugrah, "Assessing the implications
of net-zero emission pathways: An analysis of Indonesia's electricity
sector," 2021 International Conference on Technology and Policy in Energy
and Electric Power (ICT-PEP), vol. 96, pp. 270�275, Sep. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ict-pep53949.2021.9600954.
Handayani K, I. Overland, B. Suryadi, and R. Vakulchuk,
"Integrating 100% renewable energy into the electricity system: A net-zero
analysis for Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar," Energy Report, vol. 10, pp.
4849�4869, November 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.11.005.
Handayani K, P. Anugrah, F. Goembira, I. Overland, B.
Suryadi, and A. Swandaru, "Moving beyond NDCs: ASEAN's Path to a net-zero
emissions electricity sector by 2050," Applied Energy, vol. 311, p.
118580, April 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118580.
Handayani K, T. Filatova, Y. Krozer, and P. Anugrah,
"Searching for the relationship between climate change mitigation and
adaptation: An analysis of long-term power system expansion," Applied
Energy, vol. 262, p. 114485, March 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114485.
MEMR, " Technology Data for the
Indonesian Power Sector," March 2024.
MEMR, "Electricity Statistics in
2022," 2023.
MEMR, Draft National Electricity General Plan (RUKN)
2023-2060. In 2023.
MEMR, National Electricity General Plan 2019�2038, 1st ed.;
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019. Available
online: https://jdih.esdm.go.id/index.php/web/result/1973/detail
Regional Government of North Sumatra Province, Regional
Regulation of North Sumatra Province Number 4 of 2022 concerning the North
Sumatra Provincial Regional Energy General Plan for 2022-2050. In 2022.
Government of The Republic of Indonesia, Government
Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 79 of 2014 regarding National
Energy Policy. 2014.
President of the Republic of Indonesia, Presidential
Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 98 of 2021 on the Implementation
of Carbon Economic Value for Achieving Nationally Determined Contribution
Targets and Controlling Greenhouse Gas Emissions in National Development, 2021.
PT PLN (Persero), "Electricity Supply Business Plan
(RUPTL) 2021-2030," 2021.
S. Ulina, S. Hasan, E. Warman, and Y. Tri Nugraha,
"Analysis of New and Renewable Energy Potential in North Sumatra Until
2028 Using LEAP Software," RELE (Electrical Engineering and Energy):
Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 5, no. 1, July 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.30596/rele.v5i1.10786.
Sayed, AHAA. Khalil, and M. Yehia, "Modeling of
alternative scenarios for Egypt's 2050 energy mix based on LEAP analysis,"
Energy, vol. 266, p. 126615, March 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126615.
Sonjaya, A Dollar Marpaung, Sri Wiji Lestari, Nur Witdi
Yanto, and Yeti Widyawati, "Renewable Energy Potential in Sumatra in
2020-2050 Using the Long-Term Energy Alternative Planning System (LEAP),"
Journal of Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 36�57, November 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.31479/jtek.v11i1.277.
V. Wambui, F. Njoka, J. Muguthu, and P. Ndwali,
"Scenario analysis of power lines in Kenya using the Low Emission Analysis
Platform and the Next Energy Modelling system for optimization," Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Review, vol. 168, p. 112871, October 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112871.
�Z. Ren, S. Zhang, H.
Liu, R. Huang, H. Wang, and L. Pu, "Feasibility and policy involvement in
achieving net-zero emissions in China's electricity sector by 2050: An analysis
of the LEAP-REP model," Energy conversion and management, vol. 304, pp.
118230�118230, March 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118230.